Journal of Pathology Informatics Journal of Pathology Informatics
Contact us | Home | Login   |  Users Online: 712  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 




 
Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE
J Pathol Inform 2012,  3:46

Whole slide imaging for educational purposes


1 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
2 Department of Pathology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
3 Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

Date of Submission11-Sep-2012
Date of Acceptance22-Oct-2012
Date of Web Publication20-Dec-2012

Correspondence Address:
Liron Pantanowitz
Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.104908

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Digitized slides produced by whole slide image scanners can be easily shared over a network or by transferring image files to optical or other data storage devices. Navigation of digitized slides is interactive and intended to simulate viewing glass slides with a microscope (virtual microscopy). Image viewing software permits users to edit, annotate, analyze, and easily share whole slide images (WSI). As a result, WSI have begun to replace the traditional light microscope, offering a myriad of opportunities for education. This article focuses on current applications of WSI in education and proficiency testing. WSI has been successfully explored for graduate education (medical, dental, and veterinary schools), training of pathology residents, as an educational tool in allied pathology schools (e.g., cytotechnology), for virtual tracking and tutoring, tele-education (tele-conferencing), e-learning, virtual workshops, at tumor boards, with interactive publications, and on examinations. WSI supports flexible and cost-effective distant learning and augments problem-oriented teaching, competency evaluation, and proficiency testing. WSI viewed on touchscreen displays and with tablet technology are especially beneficial for education. Further investigation is necessary to develop superior WSI applications that better support education and to design viewing stations with ergonomic tools that improve the WSI-human interface and navigation of virtual slides. Studies to determine the impact of training pathologists without exposure to actual glass slides are also needed.

Keywords: Digital, education, proficiency testing, training, whole slide imaging


How to cite this article:
Pantanowitz L, Szymas J, Yagi Y, Wilbur D. Whole slide imaging for educational purposes. J Pathol Inform 2012;3:46

How to cite this URL:
Pantanowitz L, Szymas J, Yagi Y, Wilbur D. Whole slide imaging for educational purposes. J Pathol Inform [serial online] 2012 [cited 2017 Sep 22];3:46. Available from: http://www.jpathinformatics.org/text.asp?2012/3/1/46/104908


   Introduction Top


Whole slide image (WSI) scanners are robotic microscopes capable of digitizing entire glass slides. These WSI devices automatically scan glass slides and employ software to combine individual scanned fields into a composite digital image. Today, there are several commercially available systems that can digitize glass slides containing tissue sections, cytology material, blood smears, and so on. The WSI produced is of excellent quality. However, WSI files are often much larger than other digital images typically used in healthcare. Also, unlike conventional digital image files, which typically contain a single view, WSI files are formatted as multi-resolution "pyramids" that allow for optimized real-time viewer performance of selected regions across all resolutions. [1] Images can be easily shared over the Internet or on optical discs (e.g., DVDs). The speed of loading digital images depends on the speed of the user's computer and network. When retrieved, the captured "virtual" image can be visualized on a computer monitor or handheld mobile device without the use of an actual microscope, (i.e., "virtual microscopy"). New human-computer interfaces (e.g., touchscreen displays and tablet technology) that enhance WSI viewing and navigation are especially beneficial for education. Moreover, image viewing software today permits users to edit, annotate, analyze, and easily share WSI (e.g., tele-conferencing). As a result, WSI has begun to replace the traditional light microscope, offering a myriad of opportunities for education, training, competency evaluation, and proficiency testing. [2],[3],[4],[5] This review article focuses on applications of WSI in education and proficiency testing.


   General Educational Uses Top


WSI have been used for a plethora of educational activities [Table 1]. Digital slides are more interactive than static images, easier to share with multiple users anywhere at any time when compared with glass slides, and they permit training materials to be standardized by offering the same digitized slide sets to all trainees. In addition to scanning slides, the creation of digital slide teaching sets ideally requires a mechanism to make the images available to users (e.g., hyperlinks to the files on a sever) as well as software to manage the files (e.g., search function) and link them to informative metadata (e.g., clinical content and educational text discussions). Disadvantages of using glass slides for teaching purposes include expense of microscopes (multiple or multi-headed for large groups), restricted access to trainees, loss of stain quality over time, and limitations of the type of glass slides that can be shared. Histology slides that are hard to prepare (e.g., calcified and decalcified sections of bone and teeth), one of a kind exotic cases, surgical pathology cases that do not lend themselves well to recuts (e.g., needle core or small skin biopsies), consult slides that must be returned, and specific cytology cases (e.g., irreplaceable Pap tests where only one glass slide exists) infrequently get incorporated into glass slide teaching sets. Now, with WSI, the most representative slides with the best quality material can reassuringly be included into teaching sets. Not only can such materials be easily added to WSI sets, but compared with glass slides these digital slides will not fade, break, or disappear. The portability (time and location), ease of maintenance, ability to annotate images (which can be selectively hidden from trainees), linking of educational content to the files, and utility of them to construct tests is a great boon for educational purposes. However, to ensure that not just computer savvy students excel, all will require adequate training to comfortably use virtual slide technology.
Table 1: Educational uses of whole slide images

Click here to view



   Graduate Education Top


Several authors to date have documented the success of WSI in graduate education for medical, [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] dental, [13],[14] and veterinary schools. [15],[16],[17] Scanned slides for dedicated teaching should be de-identified, prior to making the WSI available for general users. Overall feedback of students for these publications was highly positive. Both students and faculty indicated strong support for using WSI to teach histology, pathology, and cytology. Students complemented the quality of the images and ease of use of the software. Thumbnail images help students maintain their orientation regardless of location or magnification. WSI promoted more interactivity between students. Tutors seem to find it easier to explain issues and findings to students using computer displays. Also, students work faster with WSI, they were more likely to study slides in preparation for practical examinations when virtual slides were available, and the novelty factor of this new modality of teaching raised the students' interest. Therefore, it is not surprising to see in many schools light microscopes been totally abandoned for computers.


   Pathology Training Top


For many of the aforementioned reasons, WSI has proved beneficial in training pathology residents. [18],[19] Centralizing WSI resources (scanning and storage) and providing easy, secure web access to digitized slides makes it possible to standardize training (e.g., grading of tumors), offer self-paced virtual rotations, manage and archive conference materials (e.g., unknown cases), and assess competency. [20],[21],[22] Digital slide teaching sets have become popular at several institutions. [23],[24] For example, at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center over 4000 WSI have been created to date for pathology educational purposes, which encompasses most anatomical pathology subspecialties. At present, digital slide sets supplement traditional microscopy training. Perhaps in the future they may completely replace conventional microscopy. A scalable, web-based atlas-like tool (called PathRez) has been created to search this WSI database. [25] Tracking tools, incorporated into WSI, also have the ability to provide quantitative metrics to help evaluate resident competency at evaluating slides. [22] Exposing pathology trainees is important to avoid technophobia, as they are the future pathologists who are most likely to use WSI technology when they graduate. Also, it will provide them with the preparatory skills necessary to better navigate digital slides which are increasingly being used on formal tests (e.g., board examinations in the USA and Europe). [26] Residents and fellows are often recruited to help add useful but curated, peer reviewed and/or edited annotations and educational content to digital teaching sets. WSI have also been successfully employed to educate cytotechnology students. [27],[28],[29] Annotated digitized slides appear to be very useful for teaching cytotechnologists cytomorphology. However, there are differences between screening and interpretive functions when examining cytology slides which still need to be explored with WSI. For example, the implications of the relatively low resolution of some WSI systems at low (screening) magnification have not been adequately studied. Moreover, viewing through a conventional light microscope may provide a different perceived field width than what is seen on a monitor. It has also been shown that cytotechnologists may have trouble with place keeping when using WSI, and that greater exploration of WSI at low magnification significantly correlates with correct diagnoses for cytotechnologists. [30] Cytology WSI with annotation, such as those belonging to the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) online virtual slide library, perform better than those without annotation. [31] This may be because they require only interpretation skills from the participants, rather than both screening and interpretive skills for WSI without annotation.


   Tracking and Tutoring Top


With the advent of WSI, it is now possible to track and audit how someone views and navigates the slide to derive at their diagnostic interpretation. [32],[33],[34] This has allowed investigators to examine the process by which pathologists arrive at a given diagnosis using a combination of their slide exploration strategy (digitally recorded slide navigation with mapped search patterns), perceptual information gathering, and cognitive decision making. [35] Examining eye movements using eye-tracking cameras while viewing slides can provide further information about a pathologists' decision-making process. Feedback with such data provided to trainees can help improve their diagnostic skills. Software can track how one views a slide in four dimensions (x and y axes, time, and zoom), areas studied for given periods of time, and include the users' comments about the areas viewed. These systems have been used to compare trainees to expert pathologists. For example, we now know that while trained pathologists spend significantly less time than residents scanning virtual slides, they take more time than trainees to dwell on locations they subsequently chose for zooming. Also, unlike residents, pathologists frequently select areas for viewing at higher magnification outside of areas of foveal (central) vision.

Researchers have recognized that there are two types of slide exploration strategy: (1) a focused and efficient search, observed when the final diagnosis was correct; and (2) a more dispersed, time-consuming strategy, observed when the final diagnosis was incorrect. [35] This difference suggests that initial interpretation of a slide may bias further slide exploration. WSI tracking tools have also been particularly helpful with respect to tutoring and assessing trainees. For example, the educational system SlideTutor (http://www.slidetutor.upmc.edu/) provides a virtual apprenticeship designed to monitor the users work, intervenes with helpful advice when they make errors, and adapts its interaction to fit their specific educational needs. Studies have shown that using SlideTutor, students are able to improve their diagnostic and reporting performance by a factor of four after as little as 4 h of use of the system. [36]


   E-Learning and Virtual Workshops Top


The field of pathology in today's era of technological advances has increasingly made use of e-learning (i.e., electronically supported learning). Web 2.0 technologies have greatly improved out-of-classroom and in-classroom educational experiences. The virtual learning environment supports distance, flexible, and cost-effective learning. E-learning pathology applications today frequently include WSI media content. Virtual workshops are becoming a popular mechanism to provide continuing medical education, particularly since they offer participants a cheaper option than traveling to meetings and the fact that an interactive WSI augments problem-oriented teaching. Prior to attending a meeting, participants used to receive glass slides or kodachrome plastic projector slides beforehand about the cases to be shown. Today, posting digitized slides online has greatly lowered the cost for organizers and improved the quality of material being shared. There are several online educational slide sharing services (e.g., PathXchange) available, and public websites (e.g., vMic Pathorama, Slide2Go) that give users access to online virtual teaching sets. [37] Virtual atlases that promote web-based learning are also now offered by several societies including the Unites States and Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), American Society of Cytopathology (ASC), and International Academy of Cytopathology (IAC). [38] The USCAP's online academy have a virtual slide box (WSI slide library of several hundred virtual slides categorized by organ system) and The Juan Rosai Collection of surgical pathology seminars (includes WSI of approximately 20,000 cases from 1945 onwards). The website for the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland also contain virtual slides. There are also some journals, such as the International Journal of Surgical Pathology [39] and Diagnostic Pathology, that have added access for readers to a WSI that accompanies an article (e.g., case reports). It is anticipated that in the near future textbooks too will begin to incorporate digitized slides for readers to access. Content creation and delivery are already available for mobile computers such as the iPad. [40]


   Tumor Boards Top


Most hospitals routinely have tumor boards where clinicians meet for multi-disciplinary case presentations. Presenting the pathology findings in these cases is often a significant component of tumor board presentations. WSI has been successfully used for this purpose at several institutional tumor boards. [41],[42] The entire histologic glass slide or all slides belonging to a case get digitized and presented in front of a live audience. The evidence to date has been positive, and apart from the novelty factor WSI presentations proved to be of a greater educational value for clinicians. For pathologists, the use of WSI at such board meetings involves less preparation time than photographing cases. In one report, pathologists saved an average of 1 h per week in preparing for these meetings, thus cutting their time by 50%. [43] Moreover, WSI permits real-time flexibility, making it easy to add on cases and show cases side-by-side. Also, because presenters have access to the entire slide, they are better equipped to address "on-the-spot" questions.


   Proficiency Testing Top


WSI are being used for performance improvement programs and have significant potential to be used in gynecologic proficiency testing. Using digital image technology (Digital Scope tool that uses the free Microsoft plug-in Silverlight) to simulate the use of a microscope in evaluating slides, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) now offer their Performance Improvement Program in Surgical Pathology (PIP) online. Web-based case review allows many users to simultaneously access digitized slides and promote timely evaluation. It is reassuring to see that pathologist's diagnostic scores do not appear to be compromised by converting to WSI. [44] As recertification in pathology becomes more important it is anticipated that WSI will be increasingly employed in some Maintenance of Certification programs. In cytopathology, the current gold standard for performing proficiency testing is manual screening or review of glass slides. Nevertheless, digital imaging is being recommended by several investigators. [45],[46],[47],[48] As WSI would certainly be more cost effective and has improved standardization for proficiency testing, it has been shown that in order for such digital programs to work, prior training of participants on the technology is required. Complaints to date are related mainly to the lengthy time experienced by users to examine digital images. Some may also argue that WSI, by not reflecting real-world experience where cytologists screen and interpret material on glass slides, is not a true test of proficiency.


   Medical Education and Examinations Top


In the context of standardized curricula and a growing number of medical students, new strategies have been employed to improve the student experience of learning pathology. As already alluded to before, the most significant technological innovation has been the introduction of WSI at medical universities around the world for web-based studies. At the Poznan University of Medical Sciences in Poland, investigators developed and evaluated a user-friendly online interactive teaching and examination platform called WebMicroscope to facilitate dental student access to pathology course material, including histological laboratory specimens. WebMicroscope using WSI as an Enhanced Compression Wavelet (ECW) file format, pioneered in aerial and satellite imagery, offers an alternative web-based method of teaching pathology. [49] The WebMicroscope server is used to host, manage, and deliver WSI-based digital slides to students during their laboratory practicals and examination. In this context, a dedicated web viewer interacts with an image server that serves out appropriate regions of the slide image. In this way, students can view digitized slides in real time without the need to download the entire image. The client module is based on a native, downloadable browser plug-in, or java script-based dynamic HTML. In the latter case, it does not require any specific downloads to the client workstation. Abandoning the use of conventional light microscopes and glass slides for training since 2005, educators at this university in Poland decided to rely on WebMicroscope to teach pathology to dental students. WSI can be visualized at any magnification and permits navigation in the x-y axis, which perfectly imitates using a traditional microscope and glass slide. The WebMicroscope allows students to independently explore the entire histological slide, as well as control the content and its rhythm of delivery. This interactive technology made microscopic laboratory studies in pathology more efficient and teaching resources more portable, independent of class schedules [Figure 1]. [50] Although the initial equipment and software cost for creating virtual slides are high, this new technology has the potential to revolutionize the way individuals teach and learn from microscopic images. For teachers, using virtual microscopy allows one to derive more information about how students learn pathology, how instructive the laboratory practicals are, and which slides are of real didactic value for the students.
Figure 1: Students slide views in a day are shown per hour. Self-study time is evident

Click here to view


Examinations that apply WSI technology online require more sophisticated test management software. In the past, Poznan University faculty employed an examination system that was restricted to the use of standard static images. This was technically less challenging and followed a routine that was similar to that of conventional paper-based examinations. [51],[52] WSI is more demanding as it requires the use of innovative image serving and viewing software, and because of the enormous size of the images, a storage facility capable of storing hundreds of gigabytes. However, the effort is worthy because WSI reflects better current laboratory activities. Allowing many students to take their examinations using virtual slides poses a challenge, with many potential bottlenecks as network demand increases with multiple simultaneous users [Figure 2]. To overcome this WSI were stored on independent servers. Serving these slides as part of the practical examination was bandwidth and server intense, particularly if the image latency was to be kept to a minimum with many students accessing the images simultaneously. A successful examination system requires multiple image servers which are carefully load balanced. This implies that when one server gets busy due to user activity, another server takes over and provides the services that are being requested. For the practical pathology examination offered at Poznan University, multiple image servers were operated in tandem, [53] allowing the processing of multiple requests for images each second without students complaining of any delays during their exam. Using WSI allows students to still ask questions without specifically highlighting the key diagnostic features as it must be done in the field of view of a static image. Even if a question refers to a specific field of view, the student can zoom out and see that field in the overall context of the slide. This contextual information, readily available in WSI, is essential to teach students both how to find the key diagnostic fields within a whole slide and to perceive how a diagnostic field fits into the surrounding non-diagnostic slide context.
Figure 2: Cumulative graph of total hits per day during the period of January-July 2011 (oral pathology course)

Click here to view


Each practical exam consisted of 50 multiple-choice questions per student. Every question was displayed together with the WSI and students had to provide an answer based on their interpretation of this slide. The scope of WSI offered was broad, designed to include all WSI used during the laboratory practicals. Questions and WSI were presented in a different order to every student. For the examination in the academic years 2008-2012, 50% of randomly rotated WSI were used to prevent "fossilization" of the students. These rotations did not influence the performance of the students. Students were given unlimited time to complete the exam. There was no time limit per slide either. Students could also view slides or answer questions in any order. All sessions of the practical exam using WSI took place in a secure location and were continuously proctored by teaching assistants. All examinations were graded using the same scale. Participants were all dental students enrolled in the pathology course between 2005 and 2012. Students were also required to complete a short anonymous survey at the time of the exam. More than 90% of responders found the WSI-based laboratory practicals and the subsequent WSI practical exam to be useful and helpful in improving their understanding of pathology. For their practical examinations students got 94-98% of their questions correct [Table 2]. This provides clear evidence of the learning benefits derived from using WSI. This seven-year experience in developing and using an examination system that applies the WebMicroscope platform with WSI indicates that despite widely available self-study possibilities, good teachers still create substantial value and practical exam scores were helpful in identifying such teachers. [54] These findings signify that the WebMicroscope platform using WSI is a promising tool for teaching and creating examinations in pathology.
Table 2: Students' practical exam performance using whole slide images (WSI) from 2006 to 2012

Click here to view



   Conclusion Top


It is obvious that in many countries, settings, and classrooms WSI has now replaced conventional microscopes. WSI is being successfully employed for undergraduate and graduate education, training of pathology residents, as an educational tool in allied pathology schools, for virtual tracking and tutoring, tele-conferencing, e-learning, virtual workshops, at tumor boards, with interactive publications, and on examinations. WSI supports flexible and cost-effective distant learning and augments problem-oriented teaching, competency evaluation, and proficiency testing. Newer human-computer interfaces such as touchscreen displays and tablet technology have proved to be especially beneficial for education using WSI. However, the current limitation with WSI is the length of time it takes to view slides. Not surprisingly, most users are not satisfied with the viewing speeds of available systems. This is partly related to the fact that large image files are difficult to manage. For example, the average size of a file for a WSI scanned at ×40 magnification (0.23 um/pixel) is 1-50 GB/image. The size would be even larger for a whole case that contains many slides. Poor PC performance, along with network limitations, can greatly hinder continuous viewing of a WSI. [Table 3] lists some of the features a pathologist needs when viewing WSI for different activities, and potential solutions for a graphical user interface (GUI) to address them. [55]
Table 3: Requirements and solutions for whole slide images viewing systems (modified from reference[55])

Click here to view


Investigators at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston evaluated a novel WSI viewing station and tool that focused primarily on speed. [52] The prototype WSI viewer they developed was based on Sony's PlayStation® 3 (PS3® ) game console with wireless controllers. The central processing unit in the PS3® , called a Cell Broadband Engine™ (Cell BE), is capable of supporting a wide range of applications that require real-time processing. The Cell BE provides nearly full-speed memory access while simultaneously carrying out parallel computation. Moreover, the ergonomic buttons on these wireless controllers offer a unique solution for a WSI-human interface to navigate virtual slides. Using this PS3® viewer, these researchers showed that most operations were reflected on a display in about one-sixtieth of a second. Pathologists were able to comfortably operate this user-friendly WSI system after minimal (0-15 min) training. Interestingly, those participants who regularly played games at home required even less (0-3 min) training. In summary, most pathologists were satisfied with the functionality, usability, and speed of this WSI system. The most difficult situation encountered was simulating diagnostic sign-out. Nevertheless, the ultra-high speed achieved by adapting the Sony PlayStation® 3 into a WSI viewing system is consistent with what would be needed to use WSI in daily practice.

Finally, as the authors are clearly the proponents of WSI for education and to some degree also for proficiency testing, in fairness this article addresses only a few of the barriers in utilizing WSI. Indeed, there are other sizeable barriers that still need to be overcome, such as the cost of WSI equipment which includes the scanner, software licenses, server hardware, storage, and information technology support on an ongoing basis. For many institutions, the expense of implementing all of the aforementioned components of a WSI system is presently far higher than the cost of a microscope, which may be negligible in many laboratories because they already have them. Also, Z-plane issues which are important for depth of focus when evaluating cytology glass slides and blood smears need to be considered. This seems to be a stumbling block for many when they transit from glass to WSI. [56] If trainees are only exposed to WSI, is there any possibility that we could be doing our patients a disservice because these future graduates may not be familiar with the advantages of focus planes? Moreover, WSI is currently being used mainly in academic centers. Therefore, will such WSI-trained professionals be ill-equipped for community practice where glass slides are likely to be still used for some time. Clearly, studies to determine the impact of training pathologists and cytotechnologists without exposure to actual glass slides are needed. Further investigation is also necessary to develop superior WSI applications that better support education.


   Acknowledgment Top


The content of this article was presented in part as a talk at the Computational and Tele-pathology Symposium during the XXIX International Congress of the International Academy of Pathology (IAP) in Cape Town, South Africa, 2012

 
   References Top

1.Parwani AV, Feldman M, Balis U, Pantanowitz L. Digital imaging. In: Pantanowitz L, Balis UJ, Tuthill JM, editors. Pathology Informatics: Theory and Practice. Vol. 15. Canada: ASCP Press; 2012. p. 231-56.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Dee FR. Virtual microscopy in pathology education. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1112-21.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Hedvat CV. Digital microscopy: Past, present, and future. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010;134:1666-70.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Pantanowitz L. Digital images and the future of digital pathology. J Pathol Inform 2010;1:15.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
5.Pantanowitz L, Valenstein PN, Evans AJ, Kaplan KJ, Pfeifer JD, Wilbur DC, et al. Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:36.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
6.Downing SW. A multimedia-based histology laboratory course: Elimination of the traditional microscope laboratory. Medinfo 1995;8:1695.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Harris T, Leaven T, Heidger P, Kreiter C, Duncan J, Dick F. Comparison of a virtual microscope laboratory to a regular microscope laboratory for teaching histology. Anat Rec 2001;265:10-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Blake CA, Lavoie HA, Millette CF. Teaching medical histology at the University of South Carolina school of medicine: Transition to virtual slides and virtual microscopes. Anat Rec B New Anat 2003;275:196-206.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Boutonnat J, Paulin C, Faure C, Colle PE, Ronot X, Seigneurin D. A pilot study in two French medical schools for teaching histology using virtual microscopy. Morphologie 2006;90:21-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Goldberg HR, Dintzis R. The positive impact of team-based virtual microscopy on student learning in physiology and histology. Adv Physiol Educ 2007;31:261-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Foster K. Medical education in the digital age: Digital whole slide imaging as an e-learning tool. J Pathol Inform 2010;1. pii: 14.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Monaco SE, Kant P, Carter G, Trucco G, KanbourShakir A, Elishaev E. A "Virtual Slide Box" using whole slide imaging for reproductive pathology education for medical students. Mod Pathol 2011;24:132A.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Chen YK, Hsue SS, Lin DC, Wang WC, Chen JY, Lin CC, et al. An application of virtual microscopy in the teaching of an oral and maxillofacial pathology laboratory course. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:342-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Weaker FJ, Herbert DC. Transition of a dental histology course from light to virtual microscopy. J Dent Educ 2009;73:1213-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Dee FR, Meyerholz DK. Teaching medical pathology in the twenty-first century: Virtual microscopy applications. J Vet Med Educ 2007;34:431-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Neel JA, Grindem CB, Bristol DG. Introduction and evaluation of virtual microscopy in teaching veterinary cytopathology. J Vet Med Educ 2007;34:437-44.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Mills PC, Bradley AP, Woodall PF, Wildermoth M. Teaching histology to first-year veterinary science students using virtual microscopy and traditional microscopy: A comparison of student responses. J Vet Med Educ 2007;34:177-82.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Kumar RK, Velan GM, Korell SO, Kandara M, Dee FR, Wakefield D. Virtual microscopy for learning and assessment in pathology. J Pathol 2004;204:613-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.Bruch LA, De Young BR, Kreiter CD, Haugen TH, Leaven TC, Dee FR. Competency assessment of residents in surgical pathology using virtual microscopy. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1122-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.Kronz JD, Silberman MA, Allsbrook WC Jr, Bastacky SI, Burks RT, Cina SJ, et al. Pathology residents' use of a Web-based tutorial to improve Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma on needle biopsies. Hum Pathol 2000;31:1044-50.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.Helin H, Lundin M, Lundin J, Martikainen P, Tammela T, Helin H, et al. Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading. Hum Pathol 2005;36:381-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.Hassell LA, Fung KM, Chaser B. Digital slides and ACGME resident competencies in anatomic pathology: An altered paradigm for acquisition and assessment. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:27.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
23.Li L, Dangott BJ, Parwani AV. Development and use of a genitourinary pathology digital teaching set for trainee education. J Pathol Inform 2010;1. pii: 2.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Sharma G, Radu O, Vu JR, Ho J, Pantanowitz L, Parwani AV, et al. Development of a dermatopathology digital slide teaching set for trainee education. Arch Path Lab Med 2011;135:1227.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Roy S, Smith M, Fusca FA, Burdelski GM, Maglicco D, Pantanowitz L, et al. Path Rez-a concept based relational database model for archival and retrieval of static images and virtual slides. Mod Pathol 2012;25:393A.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.van den Tweel JG, Bosman FT. The use of virtual slides in the EUROPALS examination. Diagn Pathol 2011;6:S23.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.Modery J, Khalbuss WE, Pantanowitz L. All aboard: Cytotechnology student training in pathology informatics. J Pathol Inform 2012;3:6.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
28.Donnelly AD, Mukherjee MS, Lyden ER, Radio SJ. Virtual microscopy in cytotechnology education: Application of knowledge from virtual to glass. Cytojournal 2012;9:12.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
29.Donnelly A, Mukherjee M, Radio S. Virtual microscopy in a female genital tract teaching module: Cytotechnology students' perspectives. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2012;1:S16.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Pantanowitz L, Khalbuss WE, Tseytlin E, Monaco SE, Zhao C, Cuda J, et al. Computer-assisted analysis of cytologists' exploration of whole slide images. J Pathol Inform 2012;3:S21.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Pantanowitz L, Nayar R, Auger M, Schmitt F, Wasserman P, Wilbur DC, et al. Evaluation of the international academy of cytology (IAC) virtual slide library. J Pathol Inform 2012;3:S7-S8.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Treanor D, Lim CH, Magee D, Bulpitt A, Quirke P. Tracking with virtual slides: A tool to study diagnostic error in histopathology. Histopathology 2009;55:37-45.  Back to cited text no. 32
[PUBMED]    
33.Mello-Thoms C, Pantanowitz L, Parwani A, Ho J, Sharma G, Crowley R. Analysis of digital slide exploration characteristics of expert pathologists. J Pathol Inform 2010;1:22.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Mello-Thoms C, Mello CA, Medvedeva O, Castine M, Legowski E, Gardner G, et al. Perceptual analysis of the reading of dermatopathology virtual slides by pathology residents. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012;136:551-62.  Back to cited text no. 34
[PUBMED]    
35.Krupinski EA, Tillack AA, Richter L, Henderson JT, Bhattacharyya AK, Scott KM, et al. Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: Implications for medical education and differences with experience. Hum Pathol 2006;37:1543-56.  Back to cited text no. 35
[PUBMED]    
36.Crowley RS, Legowski E, Medvedeva O, Tseytlin E, Roh E, Jukic D. Evaluation of an intelligent tutoring system in pathology: Effects of external representation on performance gains, metacognition, and acceptance. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:182-90.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Conran R, Fontelo P, Liu F, Fontelo M, White E. Slide2Go: A virtual slide collection for pathology education. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007;11:918.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Khalbuss WE, Pantanowitz L, Parwani AV. Digital imaging in cytopathology. Patholog Res Int 2011;2011:264683.  Back to cited text no. 38
[PUBMED]    
39.Rosai J. Digital images of case reports and other articles. Int J Surg Pathol 2007;15:5.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Collins B. iPad and cytopathology: content creation and delivery. CytoJournal 2011;8:S13-14.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Heffner S. Streamlining tumor board reviews. Adv Lab 2008;17:20.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Spinosa J. Scripp's tumor board finds value in digital imaging of slides. Dark Rep 2009;12:10-5.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.Tecotzky R. Digital pathology enhances hospital's tumor board meetings. MLO Med Lab Obs Nov 2009;41:60.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.Sharma G, Kelly SM, Wiehagen LT, Palekar A, Pantanowitz L, Parwani AV. Implementation of whole slide imaging for multi-site review of performance improvement program (PIP) slides. Arch Path Lab Med 2011;135:1227-8.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.Taylor RN, Gagnon M, Lange J, Lee T, Draut R, Kujawski E. CytoView. A prototype computer image-based Papanicolaou smear proficiency test. Acta Cytol 1999;43:1045-51.  Back to cited text no. 45
[PUBMED]    
46.Marchevsky AM, Wan Y, Thomas P, Krishnan L, Evans-Simon H, Haber H. Virtual microscopy as a tool for proficiency testing in cytopathology: A model using multiple digital images of Papanicolaou tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:1320-4.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.Gagnon M, Inhorn S, Hancock J, Keller B, Carpenter D, Merlin T, et al. Comparison of cytology proficiency testing: Glass slides vs. virtual slides. Acta Cytol 2004;48:788-94.  Back to cited text no. 47
[PUBMED]    
48.Marchevsky AM, Khurana R, Thomas P, Scharre K, Farias P, Bose S. The use of virtual microscopy for proficiency testing in gynecologic cytopathology: A feasibility study using ScanScope. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:349-55.  Back to cited text no. 48
[PUBMED]    
49.Lundin M, Lundin J, Isola J. Virtual microscopy. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:1250-1.  Back to cited text no. 49
[PUBMED]    
50.Szymas J, Lundin M. Five years of experience teaching pathology to dental students using the WebMicroscope. Diagn Pathol 2011;6:S13.  Back to cited text no. 50
[PUBMED]    
51.Szyma? J, Gawroñski M. Multimedial data base and management system for self-education and testing the students' knowledge on pathomorphology. Patol Pol 1993;44:183-7.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.Wolynska B, Kaczalski M, Szymas J. Computerized evaluation of students knowledge in a course of pathology. E J Pathol Histol 2000;6:5.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.Lundin M, Szymas J, Linder E, Beck H, de Wilde P, van Krieken H, et al. A European network for virtual microscopy: Design, implementation and evaluation of performance. Virchows Arch 2009;454:421-9.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.Szymas J, Lundin M, Lundin J. Teachers' impact on dental students' exam scored in teaching pathology of the oral cavity using WSI. Diagn Pathol 2012. [In press].  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.Yagi Y, Yoshioka S, Kyusojin H, Onozato M, Mizutani Y, Osato K, et al. An ultra-high speed whole slide image viewing system. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2012;35:65-73.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.Pantanowitz L, Parwani AV, Khalbuss WE. Digital imaging for cytopathology: Are we there yet? Cytopathology 2011;22:73-4.  Back to cited text no. 56
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Two-phase deep convolutional neural network for reducing class skewness in histopathological images based breast cancer detection
Noorul Wahab,Asifullah Khan,Yeon Soo Lee
Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2017; 85: 86
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Emerging paradigm of virtual-microscopy for histopathology diagnosis: survey of US and Canadian oral pathology trainees
Ngozi N Nwizu,Adepitan Owosho,Kalu U E Ogbureke
BDJ Open. 2017; 3: 17013
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Implementation of Whole Slide Imaging for Clinical Purposes: Issues to Consider From the Perspective of Early Adopters
Andrew J. Evans,Mohamed E. Salama,Walter H. Henricks,Liron Pantanowitz
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2017; 141(7): 944
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 The Diagnostic Concordance of Whole Slide Imaging and Light Microscopy: A Systematic Review
Edward Goacher,Rebecca Randell,Bethany Williams,Darren Treanor
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2017; 141(1): 151
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Educational Value of Digital Whole Slides Accompanying Published Online Pathology Journal Articles: A Multi-Institutional Study
Feng Yin,Gang Han,Marilyn M. Bui,Julie Gibbs,Ian Martin,Lohini Sundharkrishnan,Lauren King,Christine Jabcuga,Lauren N. Stuart,Lewis A. Hassell
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2016; 140(7): 694
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Validation of whole slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of gynaecological pathology in a University Hospital
J. Ordi,P. Castillo,A. Saco,M. del Pino,O. Ordi,L. Rodriguez-Carunchio,J. Ramirez
Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2015; 68(1): 33
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Whole slide imaging: uses and limitations for surgical pathology and teaching
Bf Boyce
Biotechnic & Histochemistry. 2015; 90(5): 321
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 A Virtual Microscope for Academic Medical Education: The Pate Project
Christoph Brochhausen,Hinrich B Winther,Christian Hundt,Volker H Schmitt,Elmar Schömer,C James Kirkpatrick
interactive Journal of Medical Research. 2015; 4(2): e11
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Online teaching of inflammatory skin pathology by a French-speaking International University Network
Emilie Perron,Maxime Battistella,Béatrice Vergier,Maryse Fiche,Philippe Bertheau,Bernard Têtu
Diagnostic Pathology. 2014; 9(Suppl 1): S5
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Students¿ performance during practical examination on whole slide images using view path tracking
Slawomir Walkowski,Mikael Lundin,Janusz Szymas,Johan Lundin
Diagnostic Pathology. 2014; 9(1): 208
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Digital pathology and image analysis augment biospecimen annotation and biobank quality assurance harmonization
Bih-Rong Wei,R. Mark Simpson
Clinical Biochemistry. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

 
Top
  

    

 
  Search
 
   Browse articles
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    General Educatio...
   Graduate Education
   Pathology Training
    Tracking and Tut...
    E-Learning and V...
   Tumor Boards
   Proficiency Testing
    Medical Educatio...
   Conclusion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2954    
    Printed150    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded645    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 11    

Recommend this journal