Journal of Pathology Informatics Journal of Pathology Informatics
Contact us | Home | Login   |  Users Online: 149  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 


ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 5

How useful are delta checks in the 21st century? A stochastic-dynamic model of specimen mix-up and detection


1 Bachelor of Health Sciences Program, Faculty of Medicine, Room G503, O'Brien Centre for the BHSc, 3330 Hospital Drive N.W, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary and Calgary Laboratory Services C414, Diagnostic and Scientific Centre 9, 3535 Research Road NW, Calgary, Canada

Correspondence Address:
Christopher Naugler
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary and Calgary Laboratory Services C414, Diagnostic and Scientific Centre 9, 3535 Research Road NW, Calgary
Canada
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.93402

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Delta checks use two specimen test results taken in succession in order to detect test result changes greater than expected physiological variation. One of the most common and serious errors detected by delta checks is specimen mix-up errors. The positive and negative predictive values of delta checks for detecting specimen mix-up errors, however, are largely unknown. Materials and Methods: We addressed this question by first constructing a stochastic dynamic model using repeat test values for five analytes from approximately 8000 inpatients in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The analytes examined were sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, and creatinine. The model simulated specimen mix-up errors by randomly switching a set number of pairs of second test results. Sensitivities and specificities were then calculated for each analyte for six combinations of delta check equations and cut-off values from the published literature. Results: Delta check specificities obtained from this model ranged from 50% to 99%; however the sensitivities were generally below 20% with the exception of creatinine for which the best performing delta check had a sensitivity of 82.8%. Within a plausible incidence range of specimen mix-ups the positive predictive values of even the best performing delta check equation and analyte became negligible. Conclusion: This finding casts doubt on the ongoing clinical utility of delta checks in the setting of low rates of specimen mix-ups.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6307    
    Printed210    
    Emailed6    
    PDF Downloaded1004    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal