Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 4: Results of automated counts using multiple regions of interest versus a single region of interest. The figures on the left show the annotation of a large area, whereas those on the right show multiple small areas selected for analysis. These different approaches to annotation of the small biopsy in (a) yielded a Ki67 labeling index of 13.2829% in 1453 cells (left) versus 21.825% in 996 cells (right). In the larger sample shown in (b), the results were 2.185% in 1144 cells (left) versus 7.285% in 1057 cells (right)

Figure 4: Results of automated counts using multiple regions of interest versus a single region of interest. The figures on the left show the annotation of a large area, whereas those on the right show multiple small areas selected for analysis. These different approaches to annotation of the small biopsy in (a) yielded a Ki67 labeling index of 13.2829% in 1453 cells (left) versus 21.825% in 996 cells (right). In the larger sample shown in (b), the results were 2.185% in 1144 cells (left) versus 7.285% in 1057 cells (right)