Journal of Pathology Informatics Journal of Pathology Informatics
Contact us | Home | Login   |  Users Online: 350  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 

Table of Contents    
J Pathol Inform 2021,  12:10

Europe unites for the digital transformation of pathology: The role of the new ESDIP

1 Pathology Laboratory, Institute of Pathology and Immunology; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Porto University, Porto, Portugal
2 Digital Pathology and IT Department, Institute of Pathology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin; Research IT Services, Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
3 Pathology Unit, “Cannizzaro” Hospital, Catania; Pathology Unit, “Gravina” Hospital, Caltagirone, Italy

Date of Submission21-Sep-2020
Date of Decision19-Nov-2020
Date of Acceptance15-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication12-Mar-2021

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Catarina Eloy
IPATIMUP, Rua Julio Amaral de Carvalho, n° 45 4200-135 Porto
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_80_20

Rights and Permissions

The European Society for Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP) was formally founded in 2016 in Berlin. After a well-participated annual general meeting, ESDIP members elected a new active structure for the next term of office. The priority goals of this new and highly motivated team will be to support the digital transformation in the pathology laboratories, to build inter-institutional bridges for cooperation, to establish a solid educational program, and to increase the collaboration with industry partners.

Keywords: Digital pathology, Europe, European Society for Digital and Integrative Pathology

How to cite this article:
Eloy C, Zerbe N, Fraggetta F. Europe unites for the digital transformation of pathology: The role of the new ESDIP. J Pathol Inform 2021;12:10

How to cite this URL:
Eloy C, Zerbe N, Fraggetta F. Europe unites for the digital transformation of pathology: The role of the new ESDIP. J Pathol Inform [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 3];12:10. Available from:

In June 1992, Kayser, from all over Europe, organized in Heidelberg, the first European conference on telepathology. That meeting brought together the nuclei of people that started the discussion about digital pathology in Europe.[1] This “digital pathology” movement grew informally for a long time by promoting events on a biannual basis. It was only in 2016, during the 13th European Conference on Digital Pathology in Berlin, that the European Society for Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP) was formally founded. ESDIP has supported the key role of the pathologist in the digital transformation, providing informal advices, promoting education on the topic, and stimulating networking with an exchange of knowledge during the editions of the European conference on digital pathology.

On July 9, 2020, after a well-participated annual general meeting (”virtual/digital” because of the COVID-19 pandemic), ESDIP members elected a new active structure for the next 3 years. Twenty-two members constitute the main structure of this society. It is a mixture of pathologists and informatics/technology researchers (ITs) from ten European countries (by alphabetic order: Bulgaria, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania, Spain, and the United Kingdom). Catarina Eloy (pathologist from Portugal) and Norman Zerbe (IT scientist from Germany) are, respectively, the new president and vice president of ESDIP. The priority goals of this new and highly motivated team will be to support the digital transformation in the pathology departments, to build inter-institutional bridges for cooperation, to establish a solid educational program, and to increase the collaboration with industry partners. According to this, the ESDIP changed the image of the institution adopting a new logo [Figure 1] and is rebuilding the website (
Figure 1: European Society for Digital and Integrative Pathology logo

Click here to view

The developmental status in the digitization process achieved nowadays is mainly the result of the technological evolution of the slide scanners with the consequent production of diagnostic quality whole-slide images (WSIs) together with the potential of storing terabytes of data and of running image analysis algorithms. However, up to now, only a few pathology laboratories are fully digital worldwide and in Europe specifically,[2],[3],[4] and the digital applications in pathology seem to be almost restricted to educational and research purposes. This is mainly due to the scepticism that pathologists have for the clinical use of the WSIs, to the believed “high cost” to convert a traditional workflow into a digital one,[5] and to the lack of a European consensus document related to digital pathology. Despite several documents already produced with regulatory function, none of these express the opinion of a multidisciplinary and international team that may represent Europe in all its quadrants. ESDIP is ready to address all these topics, with the strong believe on the collaboration between pathologists, ITs, laboratory technicians, bioscientists, students, physicians from all specialties (including surgeons and oncologists), and industry partners. This international and multidisciplinary approach makes ESDIP a unique society, with possibilities of knowledge exchange that goes beyond the boundaries of other societies.

ESDIP is also ready to integrate industry members into the ESDIP structure. The help of all the stakeholders in the domain is needed to achieve a standardization of the digital workflow as a base for subsequent high-quality and safe pathology procedures. The current ESDIP structure understands that the digital transformation of pathology laboratories encompasses deep modification in the workflow, in the quality assessment program, and in space and time organization, representing a new concept of thinking, functioning, and managing the pathology laboratory.

The movement of digitization is, in its essence, a globalizing movement that promotes connection, such as the one reached by telepathology and teleconsultation, against the isolation tendency that emerged after the COVID-19 pandemic. Cooperation agreements are underway, namely with the Digital Pathology Association, and ESDIP is open to create a connection with other dedicated institutions.

One of the major goals of the new ESDIP structure is also to promote the adoption of the new computer-based image analysis and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the daily practice as a computer-assisted diagnosis tool. The image analysis for diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic determinations appears to contribute to the precision of the pathology reports leading to the personalized modern management and treatment of patients.[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] Moreover, computational pathology, including the application of AI tools, in both research and routine demand, is fostering not only the standardization of the processes but also stimulating ethical and legal questions that need to be addressed. In the European environment, such elementary questions must be addressed in a holistic way, and ESDIP is ready to participate with its strong expert council as well.

With this in mind, the new active structure of ESDIP is preparing regular online workshops and debates on digital and integrative pathology hot topics, in addition to the annual European Congress on Digital Pathology (ECDP), as part of the educational program. The first workshop already happened on November 24, 2020, addressing the implementation of the digital workflow, and was highly appreciated by the members and additional attendees. The next edition of the ECDP will be presented online in June 2021 and it will be an event with parallel activities. In the previous editions of the ECDP, parallel activities included contests with awards to the best poster and the best presentation, DICOM and IHE group meetings, DICOM connectathon as well as challenges to IT teams (e.g., HEROHE challenge). The very structured educational program of ESDIP is designed to benefit all members of ESDIP that have doubled this year, exceeding the 100 members.

ESDIP is putting all efforts to make digital pathology the new standard in pathology, to embrace the third revolution in pathology,[11] and to demonstrate that digital pathology is per SE “pathology,” including its safety and quality-associated features, taking into consideration that “people and not technology or devices are usually the driving force behind quality.”[12]

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

Catarina Eloy, Norman Zerbe, and Filippo Fraggetta are active members of the European Society for Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP).

   References Top

Kayser K. Travels on Conferences: Evolution of Digital Pathology. Berlin: Lehmanns Media Verlag; 2019.  Back to cited text no. 1
Retamero JA, Aneiros-Fernandez J, Del Moral RG. Complete digital pathology for routine histopathology diagnosis in a multicenter hospital network. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020;144:221-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
Fraggetta F, Garozzo S, Zannoni GF, Pantanowitz L, Rossi ED. Routine digital pathology workflow: The Catania experience. J Pathol Inform 2017;8:51.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Vodovnik A, Aghdam MR. Complete routine remote digital pathology services. .J Pathol Inform 2018;9:36.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Griffin J, Treanor D. Digital pathology in clinical use: Where are we now and what is holding us back? Histopathology 2017;70:134-45.  Back to cited text no. 5
Haroske G, Zwönitzer R, Hufnagl P, Pathologie KD. “Digital Pathology in Diagnostics-reporting on digital images” guideline of the Professional Association of German Pathologists. Pathologe 2018;39 Suppl 2:250-2.  Back to cited text no. 6
Hufnagl P, Lohmann S, Schlüns K, Zerbe N. Implementation of the “Digital Pathology in Diagnostics” guideline: Support systems and their functionality. Pathologe 2018;39:222-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
Bulten W, Pinckaers H, van Boven H, Vink R, de Bel T, van Ginneken B, et al. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: A diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:233-41.  Back to cited text no. 8
Plancoulaine B, Laurinaviciene A, Herlin P, Besusparis J, Meskauskas R, Baltrusaityte I, et al. A methodology for comprehensive breast cancer Ki67 labeling index with intra-tumor heterogeneity appraisal based on hexagonal tiling of digital image analysis data. Virchows Arch 2015;467:711-22.  Back to cited text no. 9
Polonia A, Campelos S, Ribeiro A, Aymore I, Pinto D, Biskup-Fruzynska M, et al. Artificial intelligence improves the accuracy in histological classification of breast lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 2020. [Online ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 10
Salto-Tellez M, Maxwell P, Hamilton P. Artificial intelligence-the third revolution in pathology. Histopathology 2019;74:372-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
Pantanowitz L, Parwani AV. Lessons beyond barcoding: Lab automation and custom development. In: Leviss J, editor. HIT or Miss: Lessons Learned from Health Information Technology Implementations. Bethesda: AHIMA Press; 2013. p. 69-74.  Back to cited text no. 12


  [Figure 1]

This article has been cited by
1 DPA–ESDIP–JSDP task force for worldwide adoption of digital pathology
Catarina Eloy, Andrey Bychkov, Liron Pantanowitz, Filippo Fraggetta, MarilynM Bui, Junya Fukuoka, Norman Zerbe, Lewis Hassell, Anil Parwani
Journal of Pathology Informatics. 2021; 12(1): 51
[Pubmed] | [DOI]




   Browse articles
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded237    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal