Contact us
|
Home
|
Login
| Users Online: 48
Feedback
Subscribe
Advertise
Search
Advanced Search
Month wise articles
Figures next to the month indicate the number of articles in that month
2021
April
[
4
]
March
[
7
]
February
[
3
]
January
[
6
]
2020
December
[
2
]
November
[
5
]
October
[
3
]
September
[
2
]
August
[
8
]
July
[
4
]
June
[
2
]
May
[
1
]
April
[
3
]
March
[
3
]
February
[
6
]
January
[
1
]
2019
December
[
6
]
November
[
4
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
3
]
July
[
6
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
2
]
April
[
6
]
March
[
3
]
February
[
4
]
January
[
2
]
2018
December
[
10
]
November
[
4
]
October
[
3
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
1
]
July
[
3
]
June
[
5
]
May
[
4
]
April
[
10
]
March
[
2
]
February
[
4
]
2017
December
[
5
]
November
[
4
]
October
[
3
]
September
[
9
]
July
[
5
]
June
[
2
]
May
[
4
]
April
[
6
]
March
[
6
]
February
[
7
]
2016
December
[
7
]
November
[
5
]
October
[
3
]
September
[
7
]
August
[
1
]
July
[
7
]
May
[
8
]
April
[
7
]
March
[
4
]
February
[
2
]
January
[
5
]
2015
November
[
4
]
October
[
5
]
September
[
5
]
August
[
4
]
July
[
3
]
June
[
19
]
May
[
5
]
April
[
1
]
March
[
5
]
February
[
9
]
January
[
3
]
2014
November
[
2
]
October
[
5
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
6
]
July
[
8
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
3
]
March
[
8
]
February
[
3
]
January
[
4
]
2013
December
[
5
]
November
[
2
]
October
[
4
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
3
]
July
[
3
]
June
[
5
]
May
[
7
]
March
[
18
]
February
[
1
]
January
[
1
]
2012
December
[
6
]
November
[
1
]
October
[
4
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
7
]
July
[
2
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
2
]
April
[
7
]
March
[
6
]
February
[
7
]
January
[
13
]
2011
December
[
3
]
November
[
1
]
October
[
7
]
August
[
9
]
July
[
3
]
June
[
7
]
May
[
3
]
March
[
6
]
February
[
8
]
January
[
6
]
2010
December
[
4
]
November
[
1
]
October
[
6
]
September
[
1
]
August
[
6
]
July
[
6
]
May
[
5
]
» Articles published in the past year
To view other articles click corresponding year from the navigation links on the left side.
All
|
Abstracts
|
Book Review
|
Commentary
|
Editorial
|
Letters to Editor
|
Original Article
|
Original Articles
|
PV16 Abstracts
|
Research Article
|
Review Articles
|
Symposium
|
Technical Note
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
Original Article:
Performance of a web-based method for generating synoptic reports
Megan A Renshaw, Scott A Renshaw, Mercy Mena-Allauca, Patricia P Carrion, Xiaorong Mei, Arniris Narciandi, Edwin W Gould, Andrew A Renshaw
J Pathol Inform
2017, 8:13 (10 March 2017)
DOI
:10.4103/jpi.jpi_91_16
PMID
:28382227
Context:
The College of American Pathologists (CAP) requires synoptic reporting of all tumor excisions.
Objective:
To compare the performance of different methods of generating synoptic reports.
Methods:
Completeness, amendment rates, rate of timely ordering of ancillary studies (KRAS in T4/N1 colon carcinoma), and structured data file extraction were compared for four different synoptic report generating methods.
Results:
Use of the printed tumor protocols directly from the CAP website had the lowest completeness (84%) and highest amendment (1.8%) rates. Reformatting these protocols was associated with higher completeness (94%,
P
< 0.001) and reduced amendment (1%,
P
= 0.20) rates. Extraction into a structured data file was successful 93% of the time. Word-based macros improved completeness (98% vs. 94%,
P
< 0.001) but not amendment rates (1.5%). KRAS was ordered before sign out 89% of the time. In contrast, a web-based product with a reminder flag when items were missing, an embedded flag for data extraction, and a reminder to order KRAS when appropriate resulted in improved completeness (100%,
P
= 0.005), amendment rates (0.3%,
P
= 0.03), KRAS ordering before sign out (100%,
P
= 0.23), and structured data extraction (100%,
P
< 0.001) without reducing the speed (
P
= 0.34) or accuracy (
P
= 1.00) of data extraction by the reader.
Conclusion:
Completeness, amendment rates, ancillary test ordering rates, and data extraction rates vary significantly with the method used to construct the synoptic report. A web-based method compares favorably with all other methods examined and does not reduce reader usability.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (1) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Research Article:
A randomized study comparing digital imaging to traditional glass slide microscopy for breast biopsy and cancer diagnosis
Joann G Elmore, Gary M Longton, Margaret S Pepe, Patricia A Carney, Heidi D Nelson, Kimberly H Allison, Berta M Geller, Tracy Onega, Anna N. A Tosteson, Ezgi Mercan, Linda G Shapiro, Tad T Brunyé, Thomas R Morgan, Donald L Weaver
J Pathol Inform
2017, 8:12 (10 March 2017)
DOI
:10.4103/2153-3539.201920
PMID
:28382226
Background:
Digital whole slide imaging may be useful for obtaining second opinions and is used in many countries. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires verification studies.
Methods:
Pathologists were randomized to interpret one of four sets of breast biopsy cases during two phases, separated by ≥9 months, using glass slides or digital format (sixty cases per set, one slide per case,
n
= 240 cases). Accuracy was assessed by comparing interpretations to a consensus reference standard. Intraobserver reproducibility was assessed by comparing the agreement of interpretations on the same cases between two phases. Estimated probabilities of confirmation by a reference panel (i.e., predictive values) were obtained by incorporating data on the population prevalence of diagnoses.
Results:
Sixty-five percent of responding pathologists were eligible, and 252 consented to randomization; 208 completed Phase I (115 glass, 93 digital); and 172 completed Phase II (86 glass, 86 digital). Accuracy was slightly higher using glass compared to digital format and varied by category: invasive carcinoma, 96% versus 93% (
P
= 0.04); ductal carcinoma
in situ
(DCIS), 84% versus 79% (
P
< 0.01); atypia, 48% versus 43% (
P
= 0.08); and benign without atypia, 87% versus 82% (
P
< 0.01). There was a small decrease in intraobserver agreement when the format changed compared to when glass slides were used in both phases (
P
= 0.08). Predictive values for confirmation by a reference panel using glass versus digital were: invasive carcinoma, 98% and 97% (not significant [NS]); DCIS, 70% and 57% (
P
= 0.007); atypia, 38% and 28% (
P
= 0.002); and benign without atypia, 97% and 96% (NS).
Conclusions:
In this large randomized study, digital format interpretations were similar to glass slide interpretations of benign and invasive cancer cases. However, cases in the middle of the spectrum, where more inherent variability exists, may be more problematic in digital format. Future studies evaluating the effect these findings exert on clinical practice and patient outcomes are required.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (3) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Technical Note:
Turning microscopy in the medical curriculum digital: Experiences from the faculty of health and medical sciences at University of Copenhagen
Ben Vainer, Niels Werner Mortensen, Steen Seier Poulsen, Allan Have Sørensen, Jørgen Olsen, Hans Henrik Saxild, Flemming Fryd Johansen
J Pathol Inform
2017, 8:11 (10 March 2017)
DOI
:10.4103/2153-3539.201919
PMID
:28382225
Familiarity with the structure and composition of normal tissue and an understanding of the changes that occur during disease is pivotal to the study of the human body. For decades, microscope slides have been central to teaching pathology in medical courses and related subjects at the University of Copenhagen. Students had to learn how to use a microscope and envisage three-dimensional processes that occur in the body from two-dimensional glass slides. Here, we describe how a PathXL virtual microscopy system for teaching pathology and histology at the Faculty has recently been implemented, from an administrative, an economic, and a teaching perspective. This fully automatic digital microscopy system has been received positively by both teachers and students, and a decision was made to convert all courses involving microscopy to the virtual microscopy format. As a result, conventional analog microscopy will be phased out from the fall of 2016.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (1) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
RecutClub.com: An open source, whole slide image-based pathology education system
Paul A Christensen, Nathan E Lee, Michael J Thrall, Suzanne Z Powell, Patricia Chevez-Barrios, S Wesley Long
J Pathol Inform
2017, 8:10 (10 March 2017)
DOI
:10.4103/jpi.jpi_72_16
PMID
:28382224
Background:
Our institution's pathology unknown conferences provide educational cases for our residents. However, the cases have not been previously available digitally, have not been collated for postconference review, and were not accessible to a wider audience. Our objective was to create an inexpensive whole slide image (WSI) education suite to address these limitations and improve the education of pathology trainees.
Materials and Methods:
We surveyed residents regarding their preference between four unique WSI systems. We then scanned weekly unknown conference cases and study set cases and uploaded them to our custom built WSI viewer located at RecutClub.com. We measured site utilization and conference participation.
Results:
Residents preferred our OpenLayers WSI implementation to Ventana Virtuoso, Google Maps API, and OpenSlide. Over 16 months, we uploaded 1366 cases from 77 conferences and ten study sets, occupying 793.5 GB of cloud storage. Based on resident evaluations, the interface was easy to use and demonstrated minimal latency. Residents are able to review cases from home and from their mobile devices. Worldwide, 955 unique IP addresses from 52 countries have viewed cases in our site.
Conclusions:
We implemented a low-cost, publicly available repository of WSI slides for resident education. Our trainees are very satisfied with the freedom to preview either the glass slides or WSI and review the WSI postconference. Both local users and worldwide users actively and repeatedly view cases in our study set.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Identification of histological correlates of overall survival in lower grade gliomas using a bag-of-words paradigm: A preliminary analysis based on hematoxylin & eosin stained slides from the lower grade glioma cohort of the cancer genome Atlas
Reid Trenton Powell, Adriana Olar, Shivali Narang, Ganesh Rao, Erik Sulman, Gregory N Fuller, Arvind Rao
J Pathol Inform
2017, 8:9 (10 March 2017)
DOI
:10.4103/jpi.jpi_43_16
PMID
:28382223
Background:
Glioma, the most common primary brain neoplasm, describes a heterogeneous tumor of multiple histologic subtypes and cellular origins. At clinical presentation, gliomas are graded according to the World Health Organization guidelines (WHO), which reflect the malignant characteristics of the tumor based on histopathological and molecular features. Lower grade diffuse gliomas (LGGs) (WHO Grade II–III) have fewer malignant characteristics than high-grade gliomas (WHO Grade IV), and a better clinical prognosis, however, accurate discrimination of overall survival (OS) remains a challenge. In this study, we aimed to identify tissue-derived image features using a machine learning approach to predict OS in a mixed histology and grade cohort of lower grade glioma patients. To achieve this aim, we used H and E stained slides from the public LGG cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to create a machine learned dictionary of “image-derived visual words” associated with OS. We then evaluated the combined efficacy of using these visual words in predicting short versus long OS by training a generalized machine learning model. Finally, we mapped these predictive visual words back to molecular signaling cascades to infer potential drivers of the machine learned survival-associated phenotypes.
Methods:
We analyzed digitized histological sections downloaded from the LGG cohort of TCGA using a bag-of-words approach. This method identified a diverse set of histological patterns that were further correlated with OS, histology, and molecular signaling activity using Cox regression, analysis of variance, and Spearman correlation, respectively. A support vector machine (SVM) model was constructed to discriminate patients into short and long OS groups dichotomized at 24-month.
Results:
This method identified disease-relevant phenotypes associated with OS, some of which are correlated with disease-associated molecular pathways. From these image-derived phenotypes, a generalized SVM model which could discriminate 24-month OS (area under the curve, 0.76) was obtained.
Conclusion:
Here, we demonstrated one potential strategy to incorporate image features derived from H and E stained slides into predictive models of OS. In addition, we showed how these image-derived phenotypic characteristics correlate with molecular signaling activity underlying the etiology or behavior of LGG.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (3) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Symposium:
Summary of the 4
th
nordic symposium on digital pathology
Claes Lundström, Marie Waltersson, Anders Persson, Darren Treanor
J Pathol Inform
2017, 8:8 (10 March 2017)
DOI
:10.4103/jpi.jpi_5_17
PMID
:28382222
The Nordic symposium on digital pathology (NDP) was created to promote knowledge exchange across stakeholders in health care, industry, and academia. In 2016, the 4
th
NDP installment took place in Linköping, Sweden, promoting development and collaboration in digital pathology for the benefit of routine care advances. This article summarizes the symposium, gathering 170 attendees from 13 countries. This summary also contains results from a survey on integrated diagnostics aspects, in particular radiology-pathology collaboration.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Sitemap
|
What's New
|
Feedback
|
Disclaimer
|
© Journal of Pathology Informatics | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 10
th
March, 2010